Ebook Free Freakonomics: Revised Edition
Ebook Free Freakonomics: Revised Edition
When providing Freakonomics: Revised Edition as one of the collections of many publications here, we presume that it can be among the most effective publications provided. It will have several followers from all countries readers. And exactly, this is it. You can actually expose that this book is what we thought in the beginning. Well now, allow's seek for the other book title if you have actually got this book review. You may locate it on the search column that we offer.
Freakonomics: Revised Edition
Ebook Free Freakonomics: Revised Edition
Simple method to get the incredible book from seasoned writer? Why not? The means is really simple if you obtain the book here. You require only the book soft documents here. It is based upon the web links that are released in this website. By going to the link, you can acquire the book straight. And right here, you will discover lots of kinds of the books written by the expert authors from all world areas.
But, just what's your concern not too liked reading Freakonomics: Revised Edition It is a terrific task that will certainly always provide excellent advantages. Why you come to be so bizarre of it? Numerous points can be sensible why people do not like to check out Freakonomics: Revised Edition It can be the uninteresting tasks, guide Freakonomics: Revised Edition compilations to review, even careless to bring spaces anywhere. Today, for this Freakonomics: Revised Edition, you will certainly begin to enjoy reading. Why? Do you know why? Read this page by finished.
This is not about just how much this publication Freakonomics: Revised Edition prices; it is not likewise about exactly what sort of e-book you actually love to check out. It has to do with exactly what you could take as well as get from reading this Freakonomics: Revised Edition You could like to select other book; yet, it does not matter if you try to make this e-book Freakonomics: Revised Edition as your reading option. You will certainly not regret it. This soft data publication Freakonomics: Revised Edition can be your good pal all the same.
Simply adhere to the way to obtain Freakonomics: Revised Edition that we provide in this internet site. It's so basic. See the web link that we constantly supply in every page. Discover guide and get it. When you desire really the experiences to extract from this publication and also other book collections, you could see this house and search by the title. It will certainly be so simple to find out numerous the books that are written in this all over the world.
Product details
#detail-bullets .content {
margin: 0.5em 0px 0em 25px !important;
}
Audible Audiobook
Listening Length: 6 hours and 55 minutes
Program Type: Audiobook
Version: Unabridged
Publisher: HarperAudio
Audible.com Release Date: June 14, 2007
Language: English, English
ASIN: B000TK5BS2
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
Great short read! I usually know in the first couple of pages if I will finish a book and this one took three days. I enjoyed the questions asked and the answers given.Everything in the book leads up to the two issues tackled at the end: why crime rates dropped in the 90's and whether parents have an effect on children. He establishes his thoughts and ideas in the beginning in order to take on these controversial subjects - and he does it convincingly.No, this isn't a book on statistics (though it is) or regression analysis, and it never was meant to be. As the authors said, it's an introduction to asking questions and not accepting the norm. And to that end, it succeeds nicely.
3.5 ✨When I first started freakonomics, I could not put the book down, but once I reached approximately 60% you are finished with the book and all you are left with is articles from the author and references. So In fairness, had freakonomics not included all the articles and references, I would have rated it a 4.Some chapters, depending on the information, was more interesting than others. I found the chapter on crime rates dropping due to abortion to be particularly intriguing. They present a valuable side of an argument that I had never pondered. The chapter on how names can affect your success was also very interesting and just learning how they generate that data and how and when the names overlap. Very interesting.All in all, I would recommend this book to all my friends who appreciate random tidbits of information or who have a curiosity towards economics and how it plays a part in random parts of our world.
I’ve heard of this book for years, but never bothered to read it because I was already an economist and didn’t think I needed to read a popular summary of Steven Levitt’s work.[1] My impression was that the book summarized his work in a popular (non-academic) style that helped people understand what economists do. I though that the book was useful in this respect in helping people understand what I do. Indeed, the most common reaction I get from people when telling them that I am an economist is that they have read Freakonomics, which implies that they have at least seen some work similar to what I do at aguanomics.[2]It turns out that I was mistaken in my initial beliefs.I just read this 2004 book 2006 revision, and it's made me think a bit more about how we (economists) communicate with the general public, and I think that some ways are better than others. First, there are textbooks, which describe the tools that economists use to put their theories into practice. Many many people have told me “I didn’t learn anything in economics. All I remember was a lot of math and curves.†This depressing outcome results from lecturers who merely reproduce problems and equations on the blackboard, without helping students understand either why those theories are used or how they came to be so popular with economists.[3] Second, there are books that explain how economists think or how their thinking has evolved as they have tried to understand and summarize the people’s behaviour. These books, in my opinion, are the most interesting — and challenging — because they push people to revisit their assumptions and perspectives.[4] These are the books that I would recommend to people looking to “think like an economist†or, to be blunt, to think more accurately about how they and those around them actually behave. Third, there are books like mine [pdf] that try to explain how to improve failing policies using basic economic insights and incentives. Finally, there are books like Freakonomics that reproduce academic papers in a popular form. These books — like Economic Gangsters — give the public a limited vision of research without explaining the struggles of getting the right data or explaining the limitations of theories that are used (or not) in the final paper.Freakonomics is therefore NOT the book that I would recommend to anyone interested in (a) learning economic theory, (b) learning about how economists think, or (c) understanding the world or thinking of ways to improve it.This book with a memorable (but useless) name provides readers with just-so stories that are good for cocktail conversations but not for understanding economics.[5]For example,Legalized abortion explains the drop in crime in the US. Not only do Steve and Steve back off from the main claims of the original paper (they add other factors), but this theory has been falsified by others (see this and this). What struck me is their ongoing attempts to hold onto at least some elements in the original claim in later blog posts in what I’d call a “my-ladydoth-protest-too-much†manner.Real estate agents serve themselves better than they serve clients when selling their own homes. As a former real estate agent, I had to agree with their basic premise, but I thought their explanation too simplistic.[6] The most obvious problem is that agents have an entirely different understanding of themselves as sellers as well as of the markets. Surely that different information (and the resulting “patience†that gets them a higher price as sellers) matters?Looking over their other chapters (on cheating sumo wrestlers, drug dealers who live with their moms, the KKK as a multilevel marketing organization, etc.), I agree that the chapters are interesting and thought provoking, but they do not provide “lessons on the hidden side of everything.†Instead, they read like a series of magazine articles whose quirky “insights†might contribute to your next cocktail conversation.The authors say that they want you to ask more questions and see the world differently, but what tools have they given to you in this book?[7] I didn’t detect any reliable technique (except perhaps to collect a neat dataset and call Steve Levitt), and that’s where I was disappointed. Freakonomics does not really reveal the hidden side of everything. Indeed, it’s more likely to mislead you into thinking you’ve learned something, when you’ve only learned an interesting angle on a complex topic on which you may lack either the experience or methods needed to put it into a useful context.[8]Take their example of the “underpaid†drug dealer who they say faces a higher risk of death than someone on Death Row in Texas (and thus must be overestimating the gains from their job). Does this statistical analysis mean that those street dealers are irrational? I don’t think so. As all economics students learn, you need to look at their opportunity cost (i.e., the costs and benefits of their potential other choices). In this case, street dealers are (a) NOT condemned to death, (b) not able to find other work with their experience, and (c) not aware of their statistical mortality as much as their potential wealth. Those street runners are “taking their chances†in the same way as Americans are “living the dream,†i.e., in ignorance of reality.[9]Bottom Line: I give this book THREE STARS. Dubner and Levitt present interesting puzzles worthy of cocktail conversation, but they overstate their contributions and accuracy (“numbers don’t lie†but theory can be incomplete or just wrong). I suggest that anyone interested in understanding how economics works and applying those lessons to “the hidden side of everything†read Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt. It’s free to download and provides a really useful perspective that anyone can apply to any topic they care about.[10](1) I’ve met Steven Levitt. He's a fine person and excellent economist, but this book is too “pop†in its oversimplification of his work and hagiographic treatment of his insights. Yes, he brings interesting statistical tools to“freaky†questions, but he’s not a “rogue economist exploring the hidden side of everything.†He’s just a guy with a dataset and empirical theory who finds some strong correlations. As I explain later on, he does not deliver the last word on pretty much any topic in this book. (It's interesting to see the two authors pooh-poohing people's objections to their claims in this revised edition. I get the impression that their answer is "bestseller, bitch!" more than "hmmm..., maybe we claimed too much.") Also see note 8.(2) I wrote on the human right to water and oil and water for their Freakonomics blog.(3) I published an article [pdf] on how students don’t really understand the “downward sloping demand curve†because its form is based on advanced techniques they won’t see for a few more classes (meaning "never" for those who take one class or drop the major).(4) Of those I have reviewed, I recommend Small is Beautiful, the Calculus of Consent, the Company of Strangers, Predictably Irrational, etc.(5) "Freaky" anything sounds bad to me, and "freaky" economics -- unlike most economics -- isn't useful to most people. Even worse, there's nothing freaky to the stories in terms of the economics. I wish the authors had spent more time on the basic economics (making the book a useful learning experience) and less time defending empirical research that is interesting and provocative but not really wise.(6) I corresponded with Levitt’s co-author on my objections to their working paper back in 2005. The main one was that their analysis missed the most important point: it’s better to have an agent than not to have an agent — an obvious insight that saved me about €10,000 when I bought a flat in Amsterdam. Going further, would an agent work harder for you if their commission was a flat rate rather than a percentage of the sales price? They harp about commissions as detrimental to the client’s interest due to the small share of the additional profits an agent gains from working harder on your behalf — e.g., 3% of another $10,000 is only $300, but why would an agent work any harder on a flat-rate commission? In my experience, agents love on referrals from old clients, which may explain why they work hard "despite the weak incentives."(7) My definition of an expert is “someone who knows what’s missing.†As an example of this, I give a fourth reason why it’s NOT irrational to vote (they give three weak reasons in the blog post included in their revised edition), i.e., the benefits to an individual from study and engagement in a topic.(8) My years of experience traveling in 100+ countries leads me to respect the diversity of beliefs and institutions that result in a variety of outcomes. Most academics need to exit the Ivory Tower and hit the road more often.(9) On page 134, they write “The typical parenting expert, like experts in other fields, is prone to sound exceedingly sure of himself. An expert doesn’t so much argue the various sides of an issue as plant his flag firmly on one side. That’s because an expert whose argument reeks of restraint or nuance often doesn’t get much attention.†They need to apply the same critique to themselves. (They cite themselves in later chapters — p139 on abortion and crime — as if their earlier claims were facts.) As another example, take Dubner on page 199, who writes “that paper [on police officer counts and crime] was later disputed… a gradate student found an obvious mathematical mistake in it — but Levitt’s ingenuity was obvious.†I’m not sure I’d say the same about someone whose claims rested on logic with “obvious mathematical mistakesâ€!(10) Hazlitt says "the art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups," which he summarizes as "...and then what?" That's a good question, and it's how I can easily predict that cheap water prices will lead to failing infrastructure or water shortages, why climate change is arriving "too fast" (due to a lack of carbon taxes), and so on. I'd prefer people to ask "and then what?" more often and spend less time showing off their knowledge of cheating sumo wrestlers.
Very interesting read about everyday statistics and how they explain our motivations. The writers challenge some predictions and show us, with numbers, that what we predict may sometimes be different from what happens in actuality and how people think. It's a good insight into what motivates us into doing or not doing things. It is very well written. I got the audiobook version and it was very entertaining. I even let my kids listen to some parts of it. It's one of those books where you can start at the beginning middle or end and enjoy it every time. I bought a few copies as gifts for my kids' history teacher, math teacher, and language teacher. Also, a gift for my uncle and for one of my friends. Recommended. I think it's better than the following books but they are also entertaining.
Freakonomics: Revised Edition PDF
Freakonomics: Revised Edition EPub
Freakonomics: Revised Edition Doc
Freakonomics: Revised Edition iBooks
Freakonomics: Revised Edition rtf
Freakonomics: Revised Edition Mobipocket
Freakonomics: Revised Edition Kindle